So on that fateful day 12 years
ago two thousand, nine hundred and ninety six souls were lost; nineteen of
those were the terrorists. I have even
thought long and hard about the word terrorist -- what does that really
mean? Terrorism is defined as “the unlawful use or threatened use of force
or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with
the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for
ideological or political reasons”. That
does not say Muslim, it does not say middle easterner, and as a matter of fact
it does not say anything about the religion of Islam. But what is the first thing that comes to
your mind when you hear someone say terrorist?
We tend to immediately think in our minds eye, someone who is brown and
wears a turban and loose fitting layered clothing. I am almost ashamed to admit it, but I too am
guilty of that picture popping into my head.
I watched a video on the
interwebs yesterday from a show that puts people in odd situations and then
records how they react. I generally
don’t like that kind of thing but it mentioned a soldier so I thought I would
take a look. The setup was a man behind
the counter of an order-at-the-counter restaurant, decked out as a Muslim and
some kid playing this jackass who did not want to be served by him. The scene played out a number of times and
most folks did the right thing and told him to stop or to leave. Then we come to this Army Sargent who said it
best: he is allowed to be anything he
wants to be. That is why I wear the uniform
- to give him that right. I suppose we all racially profile in some
ways, even if we don’t want to admit it – we do it all the time.
But when I think back before
9-11, what did terrorist mean then - was it what we feel today? I don’t think it was. I think it was Ted Kaczynski, it was Eric
Robert Rudolph, it was Tim McVey – terrorists for sure, Rudolph was the Olympic
bomber in case you forgot. Why did these
men hate America so much? Have folks in
the middle east always hated us? Maybe,
maybe not. When we think about the two
sovereign nations that we invaded, Iraq and Afghanistan, what was the goal, the
governments of those countries were horrible hateful ass wagons and probably
deserved to be deposed. BUT, and I say
BUT both of those regimes were regimes we created in sovereign countries. We funneled billions into Afghanistan when
they were engaging the USSR. We funneled
billions more into Iraq when they were engaging Iran. Then what, they go from ally to foe,
overnight. How many times would it take
you getting stabbed in the back and tossed under the bus before you start to
think, hey wait minute here…….. there seems to be a trend here – the United
States could start to look like a terrorist to the common folks of those
countries.
Sorry, I diverted a bit.
I wanted to say that since 9-11 of 2001 one million seven hundred and
forty two thousand five hundred and twenty three souls have perished as a
result of the attacks of that date. 1,742,523 dead as a result of the attacks. That is the equivalent of every man, woman
and child in the states of Alaska, North Dakota and Wyoming combined. Or the cities of Austin TX, or Charlotte NC
or the City of Mickey Mouse in Orlando.
This is our legacy folks, we lost 2,977 and we caused the extinguishment
of 1.7 million souls in retribution.
That does not include ours or our allies military losses, so the number
is probably closer to 1.8 million. Playing
with my calculator that comes out to 604 souls dead for every one of the ones
we lost on 9-11. Talk about kicking some
fucking ass - holy shit! What other
analogy could we use where the odds are 604 to 1? There are no analogies to that because here
in the real world NOTHING is that lopsided – 604 to 1 WTF?
I don’t care who they were, what
their nationality was, what their religion was or what color eyes they
had. I, for one, will NEVER be convinced
that all of them were combatants of the group Al-Qaeda. Hell the best estimate are less than 20,000 members
total over the 25 year life of the organization. Even if you added in the Muslim Brotherhood,
who have been around since 1928 and Hezbollah and
Hamas, we still don’t even get close to the 1.8 million number. I am in no way advocating that we should have
done nothing. I am only thinking maybe
we did not take the correct course of action.
Neither Afghanistan nor Iraq did anything to the United States. Terrorists called Al-Qaeda did, and I am
saying maybe, just maybe, we should have just tracked down offending bad guys,
regardless of location and feelings of whatever government that ruled the
country they were hiding in and terminated them with extreme prejudice. Then maybe, just maybe, we would not be in
the position we are now, having most of the world hating us and us contemplating
yet another crazy fucking boondoggle war.
We just cannot afford to be engaged
in another war. We cannot afford it
financially, we cannot afford it militarily, we cannot afford it politically
and we cannot afford to have our reputation tarnished any further internationally. What is happening in Syria is HORRIBLE, it is
freaking HORRIBLE! There is no doubt
about it! BUT what is our interest
there? I have heard the words
humanitarian relief bandied about, due to the women and children, to which I
say BULLSHIT! If we as a country cared
about providing humanitarian relief we would have stopped the genocide in
Rwanda. I am sure you remember that, a
million men, women and children were slaughtered! Or maybe Dafur, but there were only 400
thousand who died there. In both cases,
the United States did nothing…… WHY? I
think the why is that there was no oil under those places. They are located outside the region where our
primary oil supply originates. That has
to why we give a shit about the countries of the middle east -- what other
reason could there be?
I was also thinking about a couple
interviews I watched with Russian President Vladimir Putin. It scared the shit out of me when I realized
that he was making more sense than my own President. I am sure you have seen them, but he asked a
lot of questions that I don’t think we have answers to yet – hell we are not
even asking the questions! I feel we
need those answers before we can make informed decisions. Our ability to rush to judgement and make
important military based decisions has a bad track record since 9-11. I think we have been so focused on
retribution that we may be missing a larger point – we are the United States. We do not invade foreign nations. We are, or used to be, the ones who had a
moral and ethical base to our national decisionmaking. I don’t feel that anymore, although some
fanatics flew some planes and killed three thousand people, we have turned that
around and are responsible for causing the deaths of 1.8 million more –
retribution at a whole new level!
I had a string on FB about our
potential role in Syria. It was an
interesting string for sure. I have a
couple of old Navy buddies who are now firefighters, so an analogy popped up
about putting out fires. While I agree
the fire needs put out in Syria, I argued that I would not expect one of them
to drive down from Maine or Massachusetts to put out a fire at my neighbor’s
house. What is happening in Syria is
HORRIBLE! It is, and shouldn’t it be
just as horrible to their neighbors. Why
not let those who are better suited and better positioned to lend assistance on
that fire?
This eye for an eye path we have been
on has proven to be BULLSHIT!! What
about turning the other cheek, what happened to that. I think we have more than settled the
score. So, the day after President Assad of Syria’s birthday I ask –
haven’t we done enough, enough killing, enough alienating, enough damage to our
reputation, enough harm to our young men and women serving on the Military,
enough money wasted abroad that could have been used here, enough erosion of
our souls – haven’t we done enough?
No comments:
Post a Comment